Sack v. Friedlander (In Re Friedlander)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing intent requirement for intentional misrepresentation under Massachusetts law and fraud under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) (1988) and “find[ing] no material difference”
• finding (i) elements of Massachusetts claim for deceit, also referred to as fraud or as fraudulent or intentional misrepresentation, “virtually identical to those of actual fraud under § 523(a)(2)(A)[,]” (ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).