Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Markarian (In Re Marrarian)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that once a case was on appeal, the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to approve the parties’ settlement on the merits, or to dismiss the adversary proceeding
• concluding, based on Cohen v. de la Cruz, 523 U.S. 213, 118 S.Ct. 1212, 1215, 140 L.Ed.2d 341 (1998) that the entire amount of damages awarded by the district court, including the pre- and post-judgment interest was excepted from discharge
• affirming bankruptcy court’s decision that all debts related to jury finding against the debtor for common-law fraud, statutory fraud and conspiracy were nondischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)
• “[Section 523(a)(2)(A) may include debts which arise from the wrongful acts of conspirators and their co-conspirators.”
• “[S]eetion 523(a)(2)(A) may include debts which arise from the wrongful acts of conspirators and their coconspirators.”
• “section 523(a)(2)(A) may include debts which arise from the wrongful acts of conspirators and their co-conspirators.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).