Skip to main content

Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.

Citations

  • 73 N.Y.2d 133
  • 538 N.Y.S.2d 513
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1315
  • 535 N.E.2d 643
  • 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Mutuality of remedy is not required in arbitration contracts” as long as “there is consideration for the entire agreement that is sufficient,” such as plaintiffs employment by defendant corporation
  • involving the arbitration of commissions claimed to be due to real estate salespeople
  • involving the arbitration of commissions claimed to be due to real estate salespeople
  • \[t]he requirement of mutuality of obligation has been denounced as defunct by a majority of courts\
  • “If there is consideration for the entire agreement that is sufficient; the consideration supports the arbitration option, as it does every other obligation in the agreement.”
  • “[t]he requirement of mutuality of obligation has been denounced as defunct by a majority of courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.