Alaska Supreme Court· 1/7/1983
Willis Flooring v. Howard S. Lease Const.
Citations
- 656 P.2d 1184
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Arbitration is not so clearly more or less fair than litigation that it is unconscionable to give one party the right of forum selection.\
- “Consideration for the option clause was included in the consideration for the entire transaction, just as consideration for every other clause was included.”
- “Arbitration is not so clearly more or less fair than litigation that it is unconscionable to give one party the right of forum selection.”
- “As one clause in a larger contract, the [arbitration] clause is binding to the same extent that the contract as a whole is binding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, C.J., Rabinowitz, Matthews and Compton, Jj., and Cranston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1989-02-21· cited 349×
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-23· cited 178×
- Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-13· cited 148×
- Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 136×
- Dan Ryan Builders, Inc. v. NelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2012-11-15· cited 91×
- Unnamed caseSecond Circuit· 1995-09-28· cited 55×
- Soto v. STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.First Circuit· 2011-04-15· cited 53×
- Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-03-02· cited 42×
- Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-10-23· cited 18×
- Anderson v. AshbySupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-05-16· cited 17×
- Walters v. AAA Waterproofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-01· cited 17×
- Walters v. A.A.A. Waterproofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-01· cited 17×
- WL Jorden & Co., Inc. v. Blythe Industries, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 1988-12-22· cited 16×
- Lexington Marketing Group, Inc. v. Goldbelt Eagle, LLCAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-05-04· cited 16×
- LaBonte Precision, Inc. v. LPI Industries CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-03· cited 14×
- Richard A. Berent v. CMH Homes, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-06-05· cited 13×
- WMX Technologies, Inc. v. JacksonM.D. Alabama· 1996-07-03· cited 5×
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. DistajoSecond Circuit· 1995-09-12· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re the Arbitration between Riccardi & Modern Silver Linen Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals· 1975-06-16· cited 31×
- Miner v. WaldenNew York Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 29×
- Hull Dye & Print Works, Inc. v. Riegel Textile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1971-11-16· cited 23×
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. CottrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-12-21· cited 20×
- Arcata Graphics Corp. v. SilinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-11-04· cited 12×
- Cored Panels, Inc. v. Meinhard Commercial Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-10-09· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.