Skip to main content
· 7/14/2005

Saberton v. Sears Roebuck and Co.

Citations

  • 392 F. Supp. 2d 1358
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29943
  • 2005 WL 1668514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Although case law permits the use of post-suit demand letters in determining the amount in controversy requirement; Defendant[’]s pre-suit settlement demand letter will not be considered as ‘other paper’ for the purpose of satisfying the amount in controversy requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.