Sierminski v. Transouth Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court correctly applied Title VII retaliation law when analyzing a claim under the Florida Whistleblower Act
• emphasizing that post-removal affidavits are allowable only if relevant to that specific point in time of removal
• “[T]he jurisdictional facts that support removal must be judged at the time of removal, and any post-petition affidavits are allowable only if relevant to that period of time.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).