Skip to main content
D. Massachusetts· 5/14/1990

Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.

Citations

  • 737 F. Supp. 135
  • 31 Fed. R. Serv. 67
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5830
  • 1990 WL 63164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing employer who argued that plaintiff was not promoted due to quality of research, but plaintiff provided peer review letters stating he had made significant contributions
  • noting that courts look primarily to issue of control
  • “the weight of authority is that no formal proceedings are necessary to satisfy the prerequisites of the rule”
  • agency relationship includes power of agent to bind principal by actions taken within scope of his agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.