Supreme Court· 10/1/1984
Birt v. Montgomery
Citations
- 469 U.S. 874
- 105 S. Ct. 232
- 53 U.S.L.W. 3241
- 83 L. Ed. 2d 161
- 1984 U.S. LEXIS 3813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ADEA plaintiffs may not recover prejudgment interest if they recover liquidated damages
- holding that ADEA plaintiffs may not recover prejudgment interest if they recover liquidated damages
- emphasizing the lack of a motion for continuance in rejecting right to counsel of choice claim
- social security payments by employer included in court’s back pay award in age discrimination case
- “Essential to effective representation ... is the independent duty to investigate and prepare.”
- Age Discrimination'in Employment Act (ADEA) case applying FLSA provisions; court held prejudgment interest cannot be awarded if plaintiffs receive liquidated damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Certiorari
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-04-04· cited 370×
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Third Circuit· 1995-05-03· cited 304×
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Third Circuit· 1987-10-02· cited 241×
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.First Circuit· 1985-03-21· cited 229×
- Jose L. Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil CompanyFirst Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 227×
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsTenth Circuit· 1990-11-27· cited 221×
- Charles Clauson v. Robert D. SmithFirst Circuit· 1987-07-17· cited 182×
- Andrew W. Hansard, Cross-Appellant v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., D/B/A Pepsi-Cola Bottling Group, Cross-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1989-02-21· cited 158×
- 53 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1814, 54 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,262 C. Roland Powers v. Grinnell Corporation, C. Roland Powers v. Grinnell CorporationFirst Circuit· 1990-09-24· cited 147×
- Daigle v. Maine Medical Center, Inc.First Circuit· 1994-01-31· cited 140×
- Furr v. AT & T Technologies, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1987-07-07· cited 138×
- 50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1099, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,295 Marcel Verbraeken, Cross-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Cross-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1989-08-29· cited 133×
- Duren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-08-24· cited 133×
- Johnny Lee Gates v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentEleventh Circuit· 1989-01-06· cited 123×
- Frank E. & Mildred E. Rickel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueThird Circuit· 1990-04-03· cited 116×
- O.P. Hollis v. J.O. Davis and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Court of Appeals, Bullock County, Criminal Courts, Union SpringsEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-18· cited 116×
- Anderson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Tenth Circuit· 1988-11-15· cited 110×
- Horace Franklin Dunkins, Jr. v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner of Alabama Department of Corrections, and W.E. Johnson, Warden, Holman UnitEleventh Circuit· 1988-08-18· cited 102×
- Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Seventh Circuit· 1988-05-26· cited 97×
- Dolen E. Lindsey, Cross-Appellee v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company, Cross-AppellantEleventh Circuit· 1987-02-24· cited 94×
Other cases named Birt v. Montgomery
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.