Sabah Shipyard Sdn. Bhd. v. M/V Harbel Tapper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a period of responsibility clause is permitted by COGSA and does not conflict with the Harter Act
• explaining that COGSA liability limits only apply to carriers
• stating the court had “yet to apply anything resembling the Zima test, opting instead to follow the plain language of [the] COGSA” (alteration added; citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).