David Taylor, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Charter Medical Corporation, and Charter Provo School, Inc. D/B/A Provo Canyon School

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming that courts may take judicial notice of documents filed in other courts for purposes of establishing the fact of that litigation and related filings
• explaining that our court has never allowed a district court to accept as true the deposition testimony from a separate case
• explaining that a district court’s refusal to take judicial notice is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• “Rule 201 authorizes the court to take notice only of ‘adjudicative facts,’ not legal determinations.”
• “A fact that 2 Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). 3 The Slayton Declaration was submitted by the defendants in opposition to CNS’s motion for relief from judgment in a separate case, Courthouse News Serv. v. Jackson, No. 4:09-cv-1844 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2020
• refusal to take judicial notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).