Ryan v. Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• severance payment where amount was based on husband’s past services to employer was compensation for past labor and therefore marital property. However, “[i]f the payment [had been] intended to replace post-marital earnings, it [would be] separate property.”
• court held that husband’s receipt of payment for unused accumulated vacation days at time of separation was marital property because large percentage of those days were accrued during the marriage and were the result of the marital enterprise
• court held that husband's receipt of payment for unused accumulated vacation days at time of separation was marital property because large percentage of those days were accrued during the marriage and were the result of the marital enterprise
• severance payment received after date divorce proceedings commenced— date on which estate is determined under relevant statute — was marital property subject to distribution because payment could be characterized as compensation for past labor rather than replacement for future earnings
• court held that husband’s receipt of payment for unused accumulated vacation days at time of separation was marital property because large percentage of those days were accrued during the marriage and were the result of the marital enterprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bornemann v. Bornemann
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-21· cited 111×
• Olivo v. Olivo
  New York Court of Appeals· 1993-11-11· cited 87×
• LM v. State, Div. of Med. Assist. & Health Serv.
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-06-07· cited 63×
• Luczkovich v. Luczkovich
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-02-24· cited 33×
• Risoldi v. Risoldi
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1999-05-03· cited 15×
• Marriage of Abrell v. Abrell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-02-04· cited 15×
• Reinbold v. Reinbold
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-05-14· cited 13×
• Ressler v. Ressler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-06· cited 12×
• Brill v. Brill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-01-29· cited 6×
• Pascale v. Pascale
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-06-22· cited 3×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-28
• In re Marriage of Abrell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2010-02-04

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Painter v. Painter
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1974-06-05· cited 215×
• In Re Marriage of Skaden
  California Supreme Court· 1977-07-19· cited 77×
• Kikkert v. Kikkert
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-02-10· cited 73×
• Kikkert v. Kikkert
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-12-01· cited 60×
• Scherzer v. Scherzer
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-10-10· cited 44×
• Thomasian v. Thomasian
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-26· cited 38×
• Whitfield v. Whitfield
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-12-18· cited 36×
• Hutchins v. Hutchins
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-09-27· cited 27×
• Brotman v. Brotman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-27· cited 20×
• In Re the Marriage of Lawson
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-03-06· cited 17×
• In Re Marriage of Flockhart
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-05-18· cited 17×
• In Re Marriage of Wright
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-02-25· cited 15×
• Biddlecom v. Biddlecom
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-11-15· cited 14×
• In Re the Marriage of Roark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-03-14· cited 11×