Rutledge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction since informant testified that he did not induce defendant into committing the act
• affirming conviction since informant testified that he did not induce defendant into committing the act
• evidence sufficed to sustain drug convictions, despite entrapment defense, where evidence supported finding that police did not trick defendant into handling drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lawrence v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-26· cited 17×
• Haralson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-04· cited 14×
• Baggs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-01-26· cited 7×
• Rapier v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-30· cited 4×
• White v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-13· cited 3×
• Graham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-08-31

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Alvarado
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-11-08· cited 76×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 49×
• Keaton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-06-12· cited 43×
• Wilkey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-19· cited 11×
• Oswell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-05-27· cited 6×