Skip to main content
· 12/16/1991

Keaton v. State

Citations

  • 307 Ark. 389
  • 821 S.W.2d 11
  • 1991 Ark. LEXIS 635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant was entitled to new trial because newly discovered phone records corroborated testimony as to defendant’s alibi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.