Ruth v. Triumph Partnerships

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “in connection with” inquiry is an objective one not subject to the unsophisticated consumer standard
• holding that the “in connection with” inquiry is an objective one not subject to the unsophisticated consumer standard
• holding that if the statements in question “plainly, on their face, are not misleading or deceptive,” a court may dispose of the case based on its own determination without looking at extrinsic evidence
• holding that if the statements in question “plainly, on their face, are not misleading or deceptive,” a court may dispose of the case based on its own determination without looking at extrinsic evidence
• recognizing that a statement which violates e(5) also violates e(10)
• recognizing that a statement which violates e(5) also violates e(10)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).