Russo v. Akers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law in its appointment of the Public Defender to represent ' [defendants] in his posteonvietion evidentiary hearing”
• rejecting argument that section 924.051(9

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russo v. Akers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-25· cited 18×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-20· cited 11×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-27· cited 8×
• Russo v. Mock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-07· cited 1×
• Koehler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-27
• Russo v. Mock
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-25

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Weeks
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-09-09· cited 121×
• Graham v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-06-22· cited 91×
• State v. Stalder
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-27· cited 71×
• Florida Dept. of Educ. v. Glasser
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 36×