Supreme Court of Florida· 6/22/1979
Graham v. State
Citations
- 372 So. 2d 1363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating, \[t]he court has the authority to summarily deny relief without appointment of counsel when the petition and record reflect it is without merit\
- \[T]here is no constitutional requirement for the appointment of counsel for an application for post-conviction relief until a colorable or justiciable issue or meritorious grievance prima facially appears in the appellant's petition.\ (emphasis added)
- “There is no absolute duty to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant in a post- conviction relief proceeding unless the application on its face reflects a colorable or justiciable issue or a meritorious grievance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-27· cited 150×
- Commonwealth v. ConceicaoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-02-28· cited 102×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-03· cited 48×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-02-11· cited 28×
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-16· cited 26×
- Russo v. AkersSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-25· cited 18×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-01-23· cited 17×
- Steele v. KehoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-20· cited 17×
- Arbelaez v. ButterworthSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-17· cited 16×
- Spalding v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-10· cited 14×
- Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-15· cited 13×
- Birge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-18· cited 13×
- Amend. to Rules of App. Proc., Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-30· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. JorandbySupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-18· cited 10×
- Schneelock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-22· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrummerSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-01-12· cited 10×
- Amendments To Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-12· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BrummerSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-12-16· cited 9×
- Madden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-15· cited 9×
- Wheeler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-15· cited 9×
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 1,935×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,488×
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-08· cited 161×
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 156×
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-11-27· cited 139×
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-09-09· cited 121×
- Alvord v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-09-17· cited 113×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 99×
- Darden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-02-18· cited 68×
- Proffitt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-05-28· cited 61×
- Sullivan v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-30· cited 56×
- Douglas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-02-18· cited 51×
- Darden v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 45×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-10-20· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.