Ninth Circuit· 11/24/1956
Russell v. Texas Co.
Citations
- 238 F.2d 636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the “abundant authority” that owner of mineral rights is entitled to take the amount of water necessary for the exploitation of the minerals
- “It is a well established principle of property law that the right to use the surface of land as an incident of the ownership of mineral rights in the land, does not carry with it the right to use the surface in aid of mining or drilling operations on other lands.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bone, Halbert, Stephens, Udge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah CorporationNinth Circuit· 1978-12-29· cited 130×
- Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1975-10-31· cited 117×
- California Pacific Bank, a California Banking Corporation v. Small Business Administration, an Agency of the United States GovernmentNinth Circuit· 1977-07-13· cited 76×
- Lena Robinson v. Diamond Housing CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1972-04-03· cited 53×
- Sollenbarger v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.D. New Mexico· 1988-08-15· cited 34×
- EOG Resources, Inc. v. Lucky Land Management, LLCSixth Circuit· 2025-04-14· cited 30×
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Flexible Tubing Corp.D. Connecticut· 1967-05-17· cited 26×
- Allison v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-17· cited 16×
- Russell v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal· 1970-04-29· cited 10×
- EQT Production Company v. Margot Beth CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2019-06-05· cited 8×
- United States v. 5.61 Acres of Land, more or less, situate in the County of El DoradoN.D. California· 1957-03-01· cited 5×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1957-01-21· cited 2×
- Joseph L. Portwood and Betty Portwood, Individuals, Trading and Doing Business as the Portwood Company v. The Federal Trade CommissionTenth Circuit· 1969-11-14· cited 2×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Greene v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court· 1941-02-26· cited 164×
- Oregon & California Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1915-06-21· cited 49×
- United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1940-12-16· cited 45×
- McCaughn v. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1936-03-30· cited 43×
- Stradley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1941-09-29· cited 32×
- Washington Water Power Co. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1943-04-30· cited 28×
- Wier v. Texas Co. Ludeau v. Texas Co. Vidrine v. Texas CoFifth Circuit· 1950-05-05· cited 21×
- Workman v. LewisNinth Circuit· 1932-11-03· cited 21×
- Williams v. BakerSupreme Court· 1873-02-10· cited 17×
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corporation v. FearNinth Circuit· 1939-06-06· cited 15×
- Inland Power & Light Co. v. GriegerNinth Circuit· 1937-07-16· cited 15×
- Continental Land Co. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1937-02-15· cited 15×
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Penick & Ford, Ltd.Eighth Circuit· 1939-03-22· cited 11×
- Larsen v. Portland California S. S. Co.Ninth Circuit· 1933-07-24· cited 8×
- Dillon Investment Co. v. KinikinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1952-03-08· cited 7×
- Sherman v. Associated Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal· 1950-12-06· cited 6×
- Hinton v. StauntonMontana Supreme Court· 1951-02-14· cited 5×
- Panama Mail S. S. Co. v. VargasNinth Circuit· 1929-07-15· cited 5×
- Moodey v. Dale Consol. MinesNinth Circuit· 1936-02-10· cited 3×
- United States v. Union Trust Co.Seventh Circuit· 1937-06-30· cited 3×
Other cases named Russell v. Texas Co.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.