Panama Mail S. S. Co. v. Vargas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an injunction against the President was unnecessary where enjoining “subordinate officials ... could substantially redress [the plaintiffs] injury”
• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1361 does not waive the federal government’s sovereign immunity
• holding that “sovereign immunity does not act as a bar to our exercising jurisdiction” since Larson-Dugan exception applies “and hence no waiver of sovereign immunity is required here.”
• holding that “sovereign immunity does not act as a bar to our exercising jurisdiction” since Larson-Dugan exception applies “and hence no waiver of sovereign immunity is required here”
• holding that courts do not have authority to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties, and noting that the rationale for this limitation is \painfully obvious\
• holding that courts do not have authority to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties, and noting that the rationale for this limitation is “painfully obvious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).