Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/13/1991
Russell v. State
Citations
- 804 S.W.2d 287
- 1991 WL 32338
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that testimony from an eyewitness that the defendant held a knife having a foot-long blade at the victim’s back was sufficient to show that it was a deadly weapon
- holding that testimony from an eyewitness that the defendant held a knife having a foot-long blade at the victim’s back was sufficient to show that it was a deadly weapon
- holding that testimony from an eyewitness that the defendant held a knife having a foot-long blade at the victim = s back was sufficient to show that it was a deadly weapon
- defining “deadly weapon” as “anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury”
- defining “deadly weapon” as “anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury”
- defining A deadly weapon @ as A anything that in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joe Spurlock, II, Farris and Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Osbaldo Esparza-GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2005-09-06· cited 47×
- Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2009-01-22· cited 28×
- Ferman Sims v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-10-06
- David Wayne Black v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-08-31
- Clifton Earl Curtis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-08-31
- Ryan Bradley Shield v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-08-10
- George Wayne Cossey A/K/A Jackie Lee Scott v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-01-12
- Nathan Darrell Neighbors A/K/A Nathann Hercules Neighbors v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-06-12
- Ennis Lee Denson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-12-10
- Dennis Michael Gosdin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-07-02
- Kent Edward Wingfield v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-22
- Matthew Buchanon Pruett v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-05-11
- Valde Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-01-08
- Hines, Charles v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-24
- United States v. Esparza-GonzalezNinth Circuit· 2005-09-06
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-09-17· cited 3,060×
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 763×
- Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-29· cited 429×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-23· cited 385×
- Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-11-21· cited 331×
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-28· cited 302×
- Mercado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-05-06· cited 276×
- Blain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-23· cited 213×
- Flournoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-02-15· cited 187×
- Lambright v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1984-10-09· cited 186×
- Simpkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-31· cited 177×
- Tisdale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-03-13· cited 167×
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-01-08· cited 132×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-05-06· cited 29×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-08· cited 18×
- Ex Parte WaltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-11-04· cited 16×
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-06-25· cited 13×
- Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-12-30· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.