United States v. Osbaldo Esparza-Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is \relevant for the court to consider the differing treatment of similarly situated potential jurors\
• stating that it is “relevant for the court to consider the differing treatment of similarly situated potential jurors”
• stating that the racial element inherent in a trial is a fact “that should also be considered when evaluating whether the totality of the circumstances gives rise to an inference of discriminatory intent”
• engaging, on direct review, in comparative juror analysis to hold that the defendant established a prima facie case of intentional unlaw- ful discrimination
• prosecutor's waiver of peremptory challenge that, given selection method, affected racial composition of jury may be weighed in Batson challenge
• “[E]nhancements based on prior convictions need not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt [to] a jury or admitted by the defendant to satisfy the Sixth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).