Rushing v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not error for indictment to aver that the offense occurred in Dallas County when offense actually occurred in another county within four hundred yards of the Dallas County line
• holding that it was not error for indictment to aver that the offense occurred in Dallas County when offense actually occmred in another county within four hundred yards of the Dallas County line

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Skillern v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-01-18· cited 298×
• Wilson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1992-06-17· cited 28×
• Osmin Agruelles Meraz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2013-10-09· cited 22×
• Chavez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-26· cited 8×
• Holdridge v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1984-12-13· cited 7×
• Glenn v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1989-10-04· cited 3×
• Therman Maurice Skillern v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1994-12-07
• Rufus Lee Hollis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2013-05-09
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1994-05-02
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 1994-07-02
• Janice Bates v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2018-01-18