Rushing v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five-month time 11 period in which three prescription forgeries were committed was not insignificant
• denial of motion to sever upheld despite the trial court not following the exact procedural guidelines in Corley

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).