Skip to main content
· 1/31/2006

Ruotolo v. Tietjen

Citations

  • 890 A.2d 166
  • 93 Conn. App. 432
  • 2006 Conn. App. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the use of an alternative devise in a will indicates an intent on the part of the testator to avoid application of the antilapse statute, thus overriding the antilapse statute
  • statute ambiguous within meaning of § 1-2z if language permits more than one plausible meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavery, Dranginis, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.