Ruklick v. Julius Schmid, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he trial court would have abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the dismissal with prejudice and to allow filing of their amended complaint.”
• “Here, the proposed amendment would apparently cure the pleading defect; it would certainly not prejudice or surprise defendants, who have been aware at least since the voluntarily dismissed complaint of the gravamen of plaintiffs’ cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).