Skip to main content
· 1/31/1994

Ruiz v. Whirlpool, Inc.

Citations

  • 12 F.3d 510
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 1960
  • 1994 WL 8172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “[t]estimony based on conjecture or speculation is insufficient to raise an issue of fact to defeat a summary judgment motion”
  • “If the evidence is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted.”
  • an expert’s opinion “that the relays for the evaporator blower fan motor could have been a source of the fire” was not sufficient to defeat summary judgment
  • an expert’s opinion “that the relays for the evaporator blower fan motor could have been a source of the fire” was not sufficient to defeat summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Jones, Duhé

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.