Ikossi-Anastasiou v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LA.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that university professor’s Equal Pay Act claim accrued, for limitations purposes, when she received her last paycheck from her state university employer
• holding that Plaintiff's claim of retaliation because of her complaint about sex discrimination was not time barred where the adverse employment action occurred within the statute of limitations, although the underlying claims were time barred
• holding time bar applied when effects of earlier act of retaliation reached their necessary conclusion within window for suit
• rejecting argument that department chair lacked power to “decide upon” professor’s request for leave where policy manual stated that vice chancellor/vice provost had authority to grant leave
• finding Ikossi’s complaints insufficient to defeat a claim for summary judgment when she could not prove that “LSU actually knew that the pay structure violated the FLSA, or that LSU ignored or failed to investigate Ikossi’s complaints” (emphasis added)
• finding Ikossi’s complaints insufficient to defeat a claim for summary judgment when she could not prove that “LSU actually knew that the pay structure violated the FLSA, or that LSU ignored or failed to investigate Ikossi’s complaints” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).