Skip to main content

Ruiz v. State

Citations

  • 249 N.W.2d 277
  • 75 Wis. 2d 230
  • 1977 Wisc. LEXIS 1416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where obvious discrepancies exist in a witness’ trial testimony or even trial testimony and earlier statements, “that fact in itself does not result in concluding as a matter of law that the witness is wholly incredible”
  • “The jury, as the judge of credibility, had the right to believe the testimony of Garcia and to disbelieve the unanimous testimony of witnesses to the contrary.”
  • “Even though there be glaring discrepancies in the testimony of a witness at trial, or between his trial testimony and his previous statements, that fact in itself does not result in concluding as a matter of law that the witness is wholly incredible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heffernan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.