Skip to main content

Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.

Citations

  • 868 S.W.2d 752
  • 1993 WL 382062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that oil company foreman lacked discretion and authority to constitute an agency or representative for venue purposes
  • recognizing that statute of limitations may be tolled indefinitely for legally incompetent persons
  • explaining that although referred to as “res judicata,” the rule was really based on the dismissal being “deemed an admission of the merit of the plea”
  • observing that “[t]he procedure mandated by this statute is fundamentally flawed because it allows appellate review of venue on a basis different from that on which it was decided”
  • holding unsound mind tolling applied when plaintiff had severe and permanent head injury
  • holding unsound mind tolling applied when plaintiff had severe and permanent head injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht, Hightower, Doggett, Gammage, Spector

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

251 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.