In Re Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court has no discretion to 24 determine legal principles controlling its venue ruling or in applying the law to the facts
• enacting section 15.0642, Legislature \left in place the `presumed harm' rule for challenging venue in an appeal after trial\
• enacting section 15.0642, Legislature “left in place the „presumed harm‟ rule for challenging venue in an appeal after trial”
• inadequate appellate remedy is not a prerequisite to mandamus relief under Tex Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 15.0642
• inadequate appellate remedy is not a prerequisite to mandamus relief under Tex . Civ . Prac . & Rem. Code § 15.0642
• orig. proceeding; Ford Motor Co. v. Johnson, 473 S.W.3d 925, 928 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2015, pet. denied). Interlocutory orders generally are not appealable. See Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).