District of Columbia· 10/29/2009
Ruiz Rivera v. Holder
Citations
- 666 F. Supp. 2d 82
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100650
- 2009 WL 3470632
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that FTCA claim against Attorney General in his official capacity was barred by sovereign immunity
- finding government defense attorneys entitled to absolute immunity because their conduct “was plainly advocatory in nature”
- finding government defense attorneys entitled to absolute immunity because their conduct “was plainly advocatory in nature”
- government defense attorneys entitled to absolute immunity in their defense of a federal government agency
- “[T]he Court’s previous decision . . . was a dismissal on standing grounds, not a final judgment on the merits, and as a result, it cannot be said that the plaintiff received or had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues alleged in this action.” (cleaned up)
- civil AUSAs entitled to absolute immunity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reggie B. Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. GuestSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-03-14· cited 35×
- Lee v. United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04· cited 6×
- Stoddard v. WynnDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-10· cited 2×
- Simon v. BickellDistrict of Columbia· 2010-09-14
- Leitner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2010-07-22
- Rivera v. U.S. Department of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2010-05-28
- Nabaya v. AberDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-31
- Bozgoz v. HaynesDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-17
- Cowtown Foundation Inc v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict of Columbia· 2022-11-01
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-22· cited 3,633×
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 3,605×
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 3,397×
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 2,529×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,988×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 1,308×
- Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,173×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.