Ruggiero v. Krzeminski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the ultimate risk of nonpersuasion [in an unreasonable search and seizure case] must remain squarely on the plaintiff in accordance with established principles governing civil trials\
• \[T]he presumption may cast upon the defendant the duty of producing evidence of consent or search incident to an arrest or other exceptions to the warrant requirement.\
• “It is elementary that in a civil action, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof on all essential elements of a claim.”
• “Simply because the jury found that the Ruggieros did not establish their claims in all respects does nothing to lessen the significance, or importance, of the Ruggie-ros’ success.”
• “Simply because the jury found that the Ruggieros did not establish their claims in all respects does nothing to lessen the significance, or importance, of the Ruggieros’ success.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).