Skip to main content

Ruffin v. State

Citations

  • 131 A.3d 295
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 642
  • 2015 WL 7890052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Lolly/Deberry “only requires that the State adequately gather and preserve physical evidence,” not test that physical evidence (citations omitted)
  • Dofondani’s motion for a Lolly instruction properly denied for State’S “failure to conduct DNA testing of the seized gun”
  • “T1io stoto’s affirmative duty ends with the collection and preservation of evidence. [Defendant] could have requested pretrial DNA testing of the seized handgun, but he did not do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Strine, Valihura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.