· 3/29/1979
Ruddock v. Ohls
Citations
- 91 Cal. App. 3d 271
- 154 Cal. Rptr. 87
- 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 1571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that child is not bound by paternity determination in marital dissolution action
- holding that child is not bound by paternity determination in marital dissolution action
- mother’s emotional and financial needs may prevent her from acting in a proper representative capacity for her child
- a child has a constitutionally protected right in preserving parent-child relationship
- applying California preclusion law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1738
- child is real party in interest in action to obtain support
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Creede, Franson, Hopper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.