Skip to main content
· 9/30/1968

Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.

Citations

  • 266 Cal. App. 2d 269
  • 72 Cal. Rptr. 102
  • 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim preclusion “should not be defeated by minor differences of form, parties, or allegations, when these are contrived only to obscure the real purpose—a second trial on the same cause between the same parties” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • adjudication in nuisance action litigated by the government can bind a later class action on an identical claim because the class was so well represented in the earlier suit that its “interest received actual and efficient protection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kerrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.