Skip to main content
· 7/2/1992

Rucker v. Pacific FM, Inc.

Citations

  • 806 F. Supp. 1453
  • 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2353
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6238
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13633
  • 1992 WL 338145

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “a termination of benefits affects a beneficiary’s rights to a much greater degree than compared to a mere modification”
  • stating that “a termination of benefits affects a beneficiary’s rights to a much greater degree than compared to a mere modification”
  • plaintiffs proffered evidence sufficient to generate a material issue of fact with respect to whether defendants intentionally concealed termination of policy
  • recog- nizing duty of prompt notification of LTD policy cancellation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.