Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 10/3/1991

Rucker v. Harford County

Citations

  • 946 F.2d 278
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a bystander shot by an officer who was aiming at the tires of a suspect’s vehicle was not seized because he “was not the intended object of the shooting by which he was injured”
  • holding Brower “directly foreclosed” the Fourth Amendment claim of a bystander accidentally shot by an officer who intended to hit a fleeing suspect
  • no violation where officers in pursuit fired upon the tires of a vehicle driven by a fleeing suspect and accidentally shot a bystander when, among other things, officers did not know the bystander was in the line of fire
  • no violation where officers in pursuit fired upon the tires of a vehicle driven by a fleeing suspect and accidentally shot a bystander when, among other things, officers did not know the bystander was in the line of fire
  • speculating about the possibility in dicta
  • speculating about the possibility in dicta

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.