Ruby Harris v. General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to “conclude [on summary judgment] that [a] defendant’s experts’ affidavits ... [were] sufficiently unassailable to take the issue of credibility from the jury” (internal footnote omitted)
• “The nonmoving party must identify specific facts, supported by evidence, and may not rely on mere allegations contained in the pleadings.”
• “The nonmoving party must identify specific facts, supported by evidence, and may not rely on mere allegations contained in the pleadings.”
• “In this case, we cannot conclude that defendant’s experts’ affidavits, as we have discussed them above, are sufficiently unassailable to take the issue of credibility from the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).