Deborah Jahn v. Equine Services, Psc Scott D. Bennett, D.V.M. Mary Beth Wallingford, D.V.M. And Richard Griffin, D.V.M.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Daubert made clear that Rule 702 relaxes the \traditional barriers\ to admitting opinion testimony
• stating that in Daubert \[t]he Court explained that Rule 702 displays a liberal thrust with the general approach of relaxing the traditional barriers to opinion testimony\
• stating that “a lack of supporting studies is not, in itself, fatal to the admissibility of expert testimony”
• explaining that Daubert made clear that Rule 702 relaxes the “traditional barriers” to admitting opinion testimony
• stating that in Daubert \[t]he Court explained that Rule 702 displays a liberal thrust with the general approach of relaxing the traditional barriers to opinion testimony\ (internal quotations omitted)
• stating that in Daubert \[t]he Court explained that Rule 702 displays a liberal thrust with the general approach of relaxing the traditional barriers to opinion testimony\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).