R.R. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[bjecause of the valid traffic stop and the bulge in the appellant’s pocket, the deputy was entitled to conduct a protective pat down search for weapons.”
• finding search of cigar tube improper where no additional circumstances gave rise to probable cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dewberry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-24· cited 22×
• Aponte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-15· cited 5×
• Santiago v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 5×
• State v. Nichols
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-30· cited 2×
• RR v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-31
• B.L.T. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-01
• Jacobs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-10
• Slade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• C.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-19· cited 23×
• Burke v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-21· cited 18×
• Howard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 13×
• B.T. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-19· cited 13×