Rouse v. Glascam Builders, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there was no potential for repetition of a condominium builder’s unfair acts toward one of the condominium owners because there was no evidence that the builder had acted unfairly or deceptively toward any other owner in the development
• \condominiums or horizontal property regimes were unknown in common law\
• defining indispensable or necessary parties pursuant to CR 19
• “condominiums or horizontal property regimes were unknown in common law”
• discussing the rights of “individual unit owners” in common areas
• isolated incident with condominium builder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).