Skip to main content
· 5/28/1987

Holaday v. Merceri

Citations

  • 742 P.2d 127
  • 49 Wash. App. 321
  • 1987 Wash. App. LEXIS 4288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that ambiguities in a separation agreement providing for the division of property, and incorporated into the dissolution decree, should be construed against the drafter/husband who was the only party represented by counsel when the parties entered into the agreement
  • noting that ambiguities in a separation agreement providing for the division of property and incorporated into the dissolution decree should be construed against the drafter/husband who was the only party represented by counsel when the parties entered into the agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster, Scholfield, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.