· 10/3/1991
Rotter v. Coconino County
Citations
- 818 P.2d 704
- 169 Ariz. 269
- 96 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1991 Ariz. LEXIS 115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- nonconforming uses should be eliminated or reduced to conformity as quickly as possible within limits of fairness and justice
- nonconforming use is a lawful use maintained after the effective date of a zoning ordinance prohibiting such use
- “[S]tatutory provisions regarding the expansion . . . of nonconforming uses should be read narrowly. . . .”
- “[S]tatutory provisions regarding the expansion ... of nonconforming uses should be read narrowly....”
- county may prohibit expansion of nonconforming use onto other property
- defining nonconforming use as “lawful use”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Gordon, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.