Skip to main content
· 10/3/1991

Rotter v. Coconino County

Citations

  • 818 P.2d 704
  • 169 Ariz. 269
  • 96 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1991 Ariz. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • nonconforming uses should be eliminated or reduced to conformity as quickly as possible within limits of fairness and justice
  • nonconforming use is a lawful use maintained after the effective date of a zoning ordinance prohibiting such use
  • “[S]tatutory provisions regarding the expansion . . . of nonconforming uses should be read narrowly. . . .”
  • “[S]tatutory provisions regarding the expansion ... of nonconforming uses should be read narrowly....”
  • county may prohibit expansion of nonconforming use onto other property
  • defining nonconforming use as “lawful use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Gordon, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.