Michigan Court of Appeals· 10/2/1969
Rothenberg v. Follman
Citations
- 172 N.W.2d 845
- 19 Mich. App. 383
- 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 959
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- whether forfeiture is unreasonable depends upon amount and length of default, amount of forfeiture, reason for delay in payment, and speed in which equity is sought
- forfeiture for minor default in payment set aside and vendees were entitled to reinstitute the original terms of the land contract upon payment of damages to vendors caused by the delay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillis, Levin, Bronson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bean v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-07-11· cited 290×
- Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-02-08· cited 74×
- In Re William Terrell and Tammy Terrell, Debtors. William Terrell and Tammy Terrell v. Eugene Albaugh, United States of America, IntervenorSixth Circuit· 1989-12-21· cited 64×
- Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-05· cited 41×
- Ellis v. ButterfieldIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 40×
- Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1970-08-17· cited 29×
- Flynn v KorneffelMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-04-30· cited 25×
- Mitchell v. DahlbergMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-03-15· cited 22×
- In Re McDanielE.D. Washington· 1988-06-30· cited 21×
- Thompson v. McCannSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-11-06· cited 21×
- In Re CarrE.D. Michigan· 1985-08-14· cited 20×
- Durda v. Chembar Development Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-03-04· cited 12×
- Emmons v. EasterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1975-06-23· cited 12×
- Kaiman Realty, Inc. v. CarmichaelHawaii Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 10×
- Ficke v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-12· cited 10×
- Local 112, I.B.E.W. Building Ass'n v. Tomlinson Dari-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-08-06· cited 9×
- Cipriano v. ToccoE.D. Michigan· 1991-02-26· cited 8×
- Day v. LacchiaMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-23· cited 5×
- Moore v. BunchMichigan Court of Appeals· 1971-01-19· cited 5×
- McWILLIAMS v. URBAN AMERICAN LAND DEVELOPMENT COMichigan Court of Appeals· 1972-01-18· cited 4×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hazeltine v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court· 1880-10-27· cited 36×
- Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court· 1903-07-14· cited 33×
- Batty v. SnookMichigan Supreme Court· 1858-06-10· cited 24×
- Lozon v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court· 1918-10-07· cited 15×
- Keller v. Paulos Land Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1967-03-09· cited 14×
- Biddle v. BiddleMichigan Supreme Court· 1918-06-25· cited 13×
- Letinsky v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-11-02· cited 11×
- Bilandzija v. ShiltsMichigan Supreme Court· 1952-09-03· cited 10×
- Decker v. PierceMichigan Supreme Court· 1916-03-31· cited 10×
- Hubbell v. OhlerMichigan Supreme Court· 1921-03-30· cited 10×
- Olson v. SashMichigan Supreme Court· 1922-03-30· cited 9×
- Zaino v. North Woodward Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1959-02-19· cited 8×
- Nash v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court· 1952-04-07· cited 4×
- Grist v. CarltonMichigan Supreme Court· 1960-06-07· cited 2×
- Cornell v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court· 1915-09-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.