Skip to main content
· 3/4/1980

Durda v. Chembar Development Corp.

Citations

  • 291 N.W.2d 179
  • 95 Mich. App. 706
  • 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 2510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • purchaser of lumber which is left at seller’s premises must pay rent after being given notice to remove the lumber or pay rent
  • “It is clear that once the vendor has elected the remedy of forfeiture and proceeded to the point of issuance of a writ of restitution, he cannot recover a deficiency judgment for money due under the contract.”
  • “It is clear that once the vendor has elected the remedy of forfeiture and proceeded to the point of issuance of a writ of restitution, he cannot recover a deficiency judgment for money due under the contract.”
  • under Michigan law “where a defaulting land contract vendee remains in possession of the property and does not redeem he is liable for the reasonable rental value from the date the period for cure expired until he vacates the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, Beasley, Bowles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.