Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 5/19/1999
Roth v. FFP Operating Partners, L.P.
Citations
- 994 S.W.2d 190
- 1999 WL 353245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing motion as no evidence motion for summary judgment where words “no- evidence” appeared at least eight times in four specific challenges to elements of claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinn and Reavis and Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
151 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dolcefino v. RandolphTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-08· cited 362×
- General Mills Restaurants, Inc. v. Texas Wings, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-02-04· cited 274×
- Brown v. BrownTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-08-30· cited 135×
- Kimber v. SiderisTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-11-23· cited 126×
- Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of DallasTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-09-08· cited 126×
- Michael v. DykeTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-04-19· cited 121×
- Cuyler v. MinnsTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-15· cited 113×
- Callaghan Ranch, Ltd. v. KillamTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2001-06-05· cited 112×
- Sunnyside Feedyard, L.C. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-03-11· cited 84×
- Thomas v. Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-09-23· cited 83×
- McClure v. AtteburyTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-12-01· cited 75×
- Crocker v. Paulyne's Nursing Home, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-02-07· cited 63×
- IBP, Inc. v. KlumpeTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-11-16· cited 60×
- First Assembly of God, Inc. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2001-07-31· cited 56×
- Walton v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2001-11-29· cited 50×
- Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-05-25· cited 49×
- Seaway Products Pipeline Co. v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-12-02· cited 43×
- Garcia v. State Farm LloydsTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-04-30· cited 42×
- Zipp Industries, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-01-18· cited 42×
- Watson v. Dallas Independent School DistrictTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-03-24· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.