Rotating Services Industries, Inc. v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because Harris established that Rotating Services was not entitled to the proceeds of the policy as a matter of law, Harris’ motion for summary judgment was sufficient to defeat Rotating Services’ claims that were added in an amended petition, filed after Harris’ motion for summary judgment
• because Harris established that Rotating Services was not entitled to the proceeds of the policy as a matter of law, Harris' motion for summary judgment was sufficient to defeat Rotating Services' claims that were added in an amended petition, filed after Harris' motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).