Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs amended petition filed after motion for summary judgment was adequately covered by the summary judgment motion because amended petition merely provided new theories of the original negligence cause of action
• holding that the new variations in plaintiffs amended petition sounded in negligence and were composed of the same essential elements previously challenged in defendant’s motion
• holding if the nonmovant is unable to provide sufficient evidence, the trial court must grant the motion
• holding if the nonmovant is unable to provide sufficient evidence, the trial court must grant the motion
• Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).