Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 9/19/1978

Ross v. Warner

Citations

  • 80 F.R.D. 88
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 909
  • 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the limitations period will begin to run again as to those claims when the group is excluded by the Second Amended Complaint”
  • notice that a class was being constricted required where the case had received substantial publicity and reliance on smaller class could occur
  • publication in the Wall Street Journal, New York Law Journal, and five newspapers
  • publicity about lawsuit could have engendered reliance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.