S.D. New York· 9/19/1978
Ross v. Warner
Citations
- 80 F.R.D. 88
- 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 909
- 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the limitations period will begin to run again as to those claims when the group is excluded by the Second Amended Complaint”
- notice that a class was being constricted required where the case had received substantial publicity and reliance on smaller class could occur
- publication in the Wall Street Journal, New York Law Journal, and five newspapers
- publicity about lawsuit could have engendered reliance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tenney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Payne v. Travenol Laboratories, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1982-04-22· cited 89×
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-03-09· cited 55×
- Araujo v. John Hancock Life InsuranceE.D. New York· 2002-06-26· cited 35×
- McDowall v. CoganE.D. New York· 2003-05-08· cited 31×
- Ross v. WarnerS.D. New York· 1979-11-28· cited 21×
- Robinson v. First National City BankS.D. New York· 1979-10-04· cited 19×
- Maddox & Starbuck, Ltd. v. British AirwaysS.D. New York· 1983-01-06· cited 14×
- Ganousis v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.N.D. Illinois· 1992-08-26· cited 10×
- Friedlander v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 1980-06-05· cited 8×
- In re New Oriental Education & Technology Group Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-05-06· cited 6×
- Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. YPF Sociedad AnonimaS.D. New York· 2013-10-08· cited 5×
- Daisy Mountain Fire District v. Microsoft Corp.D. Maryland· 2008-04-16· cited 4×
- Soler v. G & U, Inc.S.D. New York· 1983-07-14· cited 4×
- Collins v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District of Columbia· 1989-05-16· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1982-04-22
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 17,205×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court· 1939-04-24· cited 1,255×
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielThird Circuit· 1970-06-08· cited 418×
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Second Circuit· 1967-03-13· cited 350×
- Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court· 1967-12-04· cited 214×
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-06-30· cited 85×
- John S. Kirby, D/B/A Quik-Chek of Indiana and Quik-Chek, Inc. v. P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1973-11-27· cited 67×
- Rothman v. GouldS.D. New York· 1971-04-27· cited 30×
- Yaffe v. Detroit Steel Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1970-09-21· cited 25×
- Muntz v. Ohio Screw ProductsN.D. Ohio· 1973-12-20· cited 20×
- Berse v. BermanS.D. New York· 1973-08-08· cited 18×
- Bantolina v. Aloha Motors, Inc.D. Hawaii· 1977-06-06· cited 18×
- Wood v. Rex-Noreco, Inc.S.D. New York· 1973-10-05· cited 17×
- Turoff v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaN.D. Ohio· 1973-10-23· cited 12×
- Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijS.D. New York· 1948-08-12· cited 8×
- Cole v. Schenley Industries, Inc.S.D. New York· 1973-05-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.