Ross v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that the presence of uniformed police officers following a walking pedestrian and requesting to speak with him, without doing anything more, does not constitute a seizure under Article I, § 6 of the Delaware Constitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lopez-Vazquez v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-12-02· cited 42×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2011-09-02· cited 19×
• State v. Harris
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2016-07-25
• Carello v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-02-08
• Loat v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2017-02-22
• State v. Stevens
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2019-12-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• California v. Hodari D.
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
• Michigan v. Chesternut
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
• Muehler v. Mena
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 937×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1999-12-16· cited 208×
• Flonnory v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2001-11-05· cited 22×