Skip to main content

Ross v. State

Citations

  • 585 S.E.2d 666
  • 262 Ga. App. 323
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2331
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the admission of surveillance evidence that on its face reflected that it had been made on two different dates and times based upon the testimony of a store employee who was familiar with the surveillance procedures and who confirmed the content of the tape
  • surveillance videos with conflicting date and time stamps properly admitted into evidence where witness corroborated the accuracy of the events depicted in the video
  • no improper bolstering in testimony that offered no opinion and merely pointed out factual evidence which supported the contentions of the State
  • “A videotape is admissible where the operator of the machine which produced it or one who personally witnessed the events recorded testifies that the videotape accurately portrayed what the witness saw take place at the time the events occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Johnson, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.